Technical intelligence · Public sources only
Any software product.
What is it made of?
Paste a URL. Get an evidence-backed report on the product's architecture, stack, and complexity — cited like a research paper.
Technical Intelligence Report
Kurrent Capacitor
capacitor.kurrent.io · researched from 21 public sources
Highly complex system: broad agent compatibility, live capture, event sourcing, MCP recall, permission-sensitive team workflows.
Prepared from public sources only. Excludes reimplementation guidance.
The deliverable
A standardized fourteen-section dossier
Every report follows the same structure, so two products — or the same product six months apart — can be compared line for line.
Reconstructed architecture
Components, data flow, and an architecture diagram for how the product appears to work end to end — confirmed and probable details kept strictly apart.
Confirmed vs. probable stack
Technologies proven by first-party evidence — project files, official docs, package metadata — listed separately from well-supported inference.
Complexity score
A weighted 1.0–10.0 score across eight engineering dimensions, each with its own rationale.
Open-source equivalents
Closest, partial, and adjacent alternatives — with license, activity, overlap, gaps, and a similarity score for each.
Evidence ledger
Material claims carry a classification — confirmed, strongly supported, likely, possible — and numbered citations that resolve to a full source list.
Unknowns, stated plainly
What public evidence cannot establish is listed explicitly. Uncertainty is preserved, never papered over.
Full report contents
- 01Executive summary
- 02Product overview
- 03How the product works
- 04Reconstructed architecture
- 05Confirmed technology stack
- 06Probable technology stack
- 07Component-by-component analysis
- 08Technical advantages
- 09Disadvantages and tradeoffs
- 10Complexity score
- 11Open-source equivalents
- 12Unknowns and limitations
- 13Evidence ledger
- 14Sources
How it works
Three steps. The rest is our problem.
- 01
Submit a URL
Any public software product. That's all we need.
- 02
We research the public record
Deep, bounded research across the product's public footprint — never behind a login.
- 03
You get a cited dossier
Fourteen standardized sections. Every material claim classified and cited, delivered in minutes.
Pricing
Pay per report. No subscription required.
Free Preview
Proof the research worked before you unlock anything.
- ✓Product summary & identity
- ✓Complexity score teaser
- ✓One sample finding
- ✓Count of public sources reviewed
- ✓A glimpse of the architecture
Full Report
The complete standardized dossier. Nothing held back.
- ✓All fourteen sections, complete
- ✓Evidence ledger with citations
- ✓Full numbered source list
- ✓PDF & Markdown downloads
- ✓Typically 8–15 pages
Extended Report
Same structure, substantially deeper research.
- ✓Everything in Full
- ✓Up to ~2.5× the source coverage
- ✓Broader repository & package research
- ✓Expanded equivalents: direct, partial & adjacent
- ✓Deeper contradiction & historical review
- ✓Typically 15–25 pages
Five Full Reports — $299
Effectively $59.80 per report. Reports never expire.
Report depth depends on the product's public footprint — a product with a thin public record produces a shorter report at any tier. Same-product requests within 30 days are served from your report library at no charge.
Ground rules
Research you can defend
Public sources only
Pages are read exactly as a visitor sees them — never signed in, never behind a paywall, and downloaded code is never executed.
Every claim cited
Material statements reference numbered sources. Nothing can be marked confirmed without first-party evidence.
Explains, never duplicates
Reports describe how a product works. They never include reimplementation plans, schemas, or clone-building guidance.
Honestly dated
Reports carry their true research date. Repeat requests within 30 days reuse the same dated report.
Run your first report
Free during beta. Results in a few minutes, dated and sourced.